{"id":"W2978389059","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2019.1474","title":"No evidence of positive assortative mating for genetic quality in fruit flies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Insect behavior and control techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Assortative mating; Biology; Inbreeding; Mating; Selection (genetic algorithm); Sexual selection; Evolutionary biology; Genetic variation; Inbreeding depression; Adaptation (eye); Genetics; Mate choice; Genetic model; Population; Gene; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001310867,0.0001208346,0.0002889973,0.000005190539,0.0001647183,0.00003255274,0.000668077,0.0001263104,0.00006257889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004065421,0.00003752967,0.0002869626,0.0003574512,0.0004588534,0.0001096656,0.0001540814,0.0001084528,0.00000163824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000284635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001058613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005454029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000128491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987503,0.00003112984,0.0003614716,0.0003129377,0.0002730118,0.0002711034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998754,0.0005638021,0.0003605979,0.00002343149,0.0002716944,0.00002643152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003446736,0.00003680346,0.4862258,0.00002030946,0.000003605327,7.280918e-9,0.0001736293,0.000001144072,0.510609,0.001143004,0.00002008511,0.001732218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007931444,0.00106991,0.9562992,0.0001627712,0.000006324108,1.705158e-7,0.001158574,0.0003977533,0.03797967,0.002714854,0.0000134505,0.0001179395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979926,0.0001079102,0.000002063329,0.0002192127,0.00004363287,0.0006087898,0.00002263214,0.00002274537,0.000980443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978485,0.00002559544,0.001831249,0.0001104997,0.00003463813,0.00004613183,6.69287e-7,4.815823e-7,0.0001022879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4726293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1690664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05088352139880371,"score_gpt":0.3029660532709988,"score_spread":0.2520825318721951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}