{"id":"W2978389059","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2019.1474","title":"No evidence of positive assortative mating for genetic quality in fruit flies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Insect behavior and control techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Assortative mating; Biology; Inbreeding; Mating; Selection (genetic algorithm); Sexual selection; Evolutionary biology; Genetic variation; Inbreeding depression; Adaptation (eye); Genetics; Mate choice; Genetic model; Population; Gene; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204347,0.0003147211,0.000412181,0.0005296849,0.0003759848,0.0005583729,0.0005963831,0.0005059328,0.00202572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002022243,0.0003244912,0.0002838317,0.0002990515,0.0008732025,0.0003887967,0.0005158928,0.0005759246,0.0002474718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003103302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002577082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005811141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002120041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984795,0.0002737393,0.0001590279,0.0004561836,0.0005460698,0.00008544781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950265,0.0014296,0.001461461,0.001140591,0.0003965541,0.0005453262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002116258,0.0001164913,0.03528673,0.0001104576,0.00009065098,0.0001474107,0.000218663,0.0001067639,0.957342,0.000520293,0.00007510451,0.005773926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006602538,0.001841955,0.6068592,0.00004230487,0.0002082454,0.002224255,0.0002722628,0.002982669,0.3812666,0.001551795,0.002595458,0.00008928413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931266,0.0004448836,0.004574906,0.00009173547,0.00001786212,0.00003282313,0.0002162569,0.00003270333,0.001462192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960514,0.0001307205,0.002680512,0.0001469033,0.000009117717,0.0000357207,0.0001901652,0.0000230569,0.0007324605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00202572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00677669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05088352139880371,"score_gpt":0.3029660532709988,"score_spread":0.2520825318721951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}