{"id":"W2979464434","doi":"10.1103/physreve.100.042109","title":"Occupancy correlations in the asymmetric simple inclusion process","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical review. E","topic":"Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; Tel Aviv University","keywords":"Occupancy; Asymmetric simple exclusion process; Statistical physics; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Monte Carlo method; Lattice (music); Process (computing); Applied mathematics; Covariance; Tandem; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003588244,0.0001252025,0.000334614,0.00003944185,0.00009640705,0.00001406366,0.0003255421,0.00002636481,0.00006344454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003445766,0.00007732894,0.00007674707,0.0009347333,0.00001405013,0.00007238572,0.0001613656,0.0002416359,0.0002855335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002388212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003954491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004612406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003084892,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988314,0.00006625689,0.0002745613,0.0002017701,0.0004180431,0.0002079911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975212,0.001943363,0.0001058289,0.0003038675,0.0000805928,0.00004515819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006320015,0.0003597028,0.0001444272,0.001949673,0.000005711175,0.000003533992,0.0005437596,0.000003327257,0.0000199329,0.9795951,0.001494546,0.01587395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001646165,0.00007933765,0.0002459187,0.0005339156,0.00005071747,0.000003782817,0.00004258817,0.01370559,0.00001840966,0.9839497,0.001088746,0.0001166695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3702816,0.01538913,0.5326737,0.005240533,0.0006127776,0.008094519,0.0001291722,0.0002767711,0.06730182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980801,0.0002911518,0.0005739363,0.0008530918,0.0000678555,0.00008202092,0.000009347621,0.00001365174,0.00002878951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6277986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4125152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03863204426572891,"score_gpt":0.4134607989118842,"score_spread":0.3748287546461553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}