{"id":"W2979807990","doi":"10.1111/brv.12560","title":"An ecological framework of neophobia: from cells to organisms to populations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Neophobia; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Perspective (graphical); Developmental psychology; Ecology; Geography; Computer science; Biology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001817518,0.0008685829,0.000663408,0.001690116,0.001539064,0.003756274,0.001700342,0.002220455,0.004146399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001975462,0.0003086622,0.0007007025,0.0008064163,0.01908748,0.005150758,0.002886616,0.00322769,0.0005895236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00269155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00104921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00333876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002250917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989448,0.0004696643,0.00005497914,0.0002654533,0.0001665016,0.00009861058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989221,0.0004875532,0.0001379167,0.0001339625,0.000180812,0.0001377831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000169907,0.00001513356,0.001113397,0.0002434035,0.00002398092,0.0002038061,0.001640878,0.002352746,0.003123061,0.9791175,0.001370514,0.01077861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006653188,0.00005190582,0.003352761,0.00008919867,0.00001818844,0.0003773077,0.0007543151,0.003505475,0.0004387474,0.9565042,0.03487319,0.00002810891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.07246833,0.04744389,0.5648286,0.08267746,0.002280135,0.0002243903,0.0006516073,0.0004837792,0.2289419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8284485,0.01874266,0.128433,0.008870116,0.001488683,0.0004186902,0.000203232,0.0001361274,0.01325898],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004146399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01952869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2471666018349158,"score_gpt":0.3517852525737334,"score_spread":0.1046186507388177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}