{"id":"W2979914303","doi":"10.1080/10168664.2019.1639480","title":"IABSE Task Group 3.1 Benchmark Results. Part 1: Numerical Analysis of a Two-Degree-of-Freedom Bridge Deck Section Based on Analytical Aerodynamics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Structural Engineering International","topic":"Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Aerodynamics; Structural engineering; Bridge (graph theory); Section (typography); Group (periodic table); Engineering; Benchmark (surveying); Deck; Degree (music); Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Bridge deck; Computer science; Aerospace engineering; Geology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01645687,0.002259018,0.001526127,0.002750923,0.001555329,0.002248361,0.003934065,0.00282426,0.006059294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02026161,0.0005273736,0.002065014,0.002393266,0.0006049143,0.001418311,0.002312528,0.001296722,0.004646481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001516746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003605723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007317484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004737053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914246,0.002298667,0.000635562,0.0005656191,0.004521762,0.0005537457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799437,0.002708612,0.0007112334,0.003906423,0.01224041,0.0004896531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001916571,0.003600703,0.02028728,0.00399783,0.0004462557,0.0005509526,0.0006614875,0.4845396,0.09870376,0.0224538,0.1483585,0.2144834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008396055,0.005465413,0.03627026,0.002248581,0.0003648059,0.0007231846,0.0008496265,0.392096,0.2949866,0.01485642,0.2508865,0.0004130167],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1937251,0.004216037,0.5474832,0.002087454,0.001617391,0.005561572,0.09067977,0.01304966,0.1415798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4149054,0.002290187,0.349018,0.0006949361,0.0002210733,0.00802605,0.2003232,0.005846,0.01867516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01645687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08703327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009635056737279622,"score_gpt":0.2345722433962867,"score_spread":0.2249371866590071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}