{"id":"W2980178188","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00009","title":"On the topicality and research impact of special issues","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Discipline; Scarcity; Analytics; Phenomenon; Quality (philosophy); Test (biology); Space (punctuation); Political science; Positive economics; Sociology; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Epistemology; Economics; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02517308,0.0003616156,0.001082891,0.03285413,0.002493443,0.01131147,0.0007971168,0.001100331,0.007216699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1314865,0.0002694427,0.0007774527,0.0301874,0.003133863,0.009438893,0.005465508,0.001625892,0.001484529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001874766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001698335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001237887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001457146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9816098,0.005688128,0.002436488,0.002093618,0.006767208,0.001404714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7311366,0.154438,0.05806946,0.01455208,0.03293505,0.008868918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007580193,0.0002135679,0.7195765,0.002112833,0.0005500537,0.0009544363,0.02703494,0.0009931938,0.00640719,0.03131407,0.008323135,0.2017621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002505367,0.0002225322,0.9378114,0.0005166923,0.0002550378,0.0006640631,0.01570928,0.0009496593,0.002024595,0.0134492,0.02830184,0.00007064787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8915494,0.0194956,0.006887805,0.006778569,0.0007883018,0.0001967177,0.002050237,0.0001489469,0.07210442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913623,0.003145932,0.001323004,0.0001949385,0.001226731,0.00005936461,0.0007838331,0.00005821918,0.001845874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9748269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1331296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8962515934314642,"score_gpt":0.756896630519447,"score_spread":0.1393549629120172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}