{"id":"W2980364240","doi":"10.1007/jhep09(2019)121","title":"Erratum to: On the Noether charge and the gravity duals of quantum complexity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of High Energy Physics","topic":"Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Noether's theorem; Physics; Dual polyhedron; Mistake; Theoretical physics; Charge (physics); Mathematical physics; Quantum; State (computer science); Quantum gravity; Quantum mechanics; Pure mathematics; Law; Lagrangian; Algorithm; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001056993,0.0004031581,0.0009978608,0.0001065841,0.0002371369,0.0001787131,0.002125266,0.0001784139,0.00000516902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007621144,0.0001936161,0.0004033781,0.0004154828,0.0003342338,0.0001030076,0.0005710042,0.00149868,0.000006048733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003193633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002466101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000156239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000601864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971922,0.0005194676,0.0006514988,0.0003442612,0.0009466615,0.0003459289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963912,0.0007206947,0.001435142,0.0009871878,0.0003516675,0.0001141142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004012282,0.00007732886,0.000001124248,0.00002467031,0.0001253262,0.000006454799,0.0004185317,0.001172585,0.000008961718,0.7257124,0.2699317,0.002480754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001001279,0.0007216883,0.000352191,0.0006658397,0.00007838347,0.00007311101,0.00002062152,0.08869442,0.0003839707,0.8146982,0.09286237,0.0004479065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04302101,0.004693834,0.6892353,0.09009081,0.1595884,0.001132928,0.0001955011,0.000153993,0.01188817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615296,0.0005969037,0.004524905,0.006647827,0.009554622,0.000009067206,0.00001624919,0.0001254325,0.01699542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9185086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7895434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01802881897449823,"score_gpt":0.238251821208343,"score_spread":0.2202230022338448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}