{"id":"W2980424787","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0223508","title":"A meta-analysis of crop response patterns to nitrogen limitation for improved model representation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Photosynthesis; RuBisCO; Sink (geography); Ecosystem; Crop; Carbon sink; Agronomy; Environmental science; Biology; Ecology; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01600701,0.002387585,0.005268296,0.003144442,0.0004636748,0.002008879,0.002893197,0.00190315,0.004854413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02206201,0.001024204,0.02416012,0.004604763,0.0003294723,0.001459279,0.001401848,0.001943747,0.0004891395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001211162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001739358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008593973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007233774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945346,0.004062545,0.0003239748,0.0007919741,0.0001854125,0.0001014113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816922,0.01511144,0.0005454518,0.002093518,0.0003770846,0.0001802972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002740988,0.000139219,0.02764904,0.02386399,0.6931886,0.000672359,0.0002061815,0.1961708,0.009368949,0.007227821,0.005018514,0.03375354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001429631,0.0008899353,0.02890797,0.002339333,0.5488365,0.0003888644,0.0002630996,0.3481811,0.004744369,0.03230215,0.03143829,0.0002787679],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2244074,0.2247141,0.4882107,0.006480014,0.001747295,0.0008282964,0.04422686,0.005675924,0.003709316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8322287,0.01797788,0.13337,0.001197323,0.0002041679,0.001426038,0.01161123,0.0009488572,0.001035716],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01600701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08465421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4161543091505426,"score_gpt":0.3486841336635307,"score_spread":0.06747017548701184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}