{"id":"W2980703491","doi":"10.3390/ijerph16203975","title":"Past, Present, and Future of Groundwater Remediation Research: A Scientometric Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","topic":"Arsenic contamination and mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Environmental remediation; Groundwater; Science Citation Index; Environmental science; Groundwater remediation; Multidisciplinary approach; Identification (biology); Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Citation; Engineering; Computer science; Ecology; Political science; Contamination","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006955227,0.0005994245,0.0009661991,0.07805341,0.0009384433,0.004493392,0.000614092,0.000627551,0.002292428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01860888,0.0002703851,0.001180826,0.1125254,0.001003969,0.00598586,0.001459617,0.0004995386,0.0003798842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00217983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003937226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004502375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007789774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959865,0.0008218604,0.0007015412,0.0004686422,0.001849505,0.0001718522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850082,0.009056674,0.002095902,0.0005587792,0.00295662,0.0003238693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001038432,0.00005099007,0.09566388,0.02843395,0.001330847,0.0005430193,0.003896738,0.002523369,0.001317524,0.02197502,0.01266199,0.8314989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003133355,0.0002173142,0.4104529,0.02502858,0.004045489,0.003289832,0.0144186,0.006824918,0.001887052,0.04436888,0.489179,0.0002560085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1465874,0.7734121,0.01176269,0.009382736,0.0005191586,0.0003270167,0.01155507,0.0002229614,0.04623075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4554386,0.5239239,0.01132957,0.000652505,0.0006967614,0.0002814212,0.005920066,0.00004860545,0.001708476],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9219466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03678316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1953678649856987,"score_gpt":0.4571568948451414,"score_spread":0.2617890298594427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}