{"id":"W2980833345","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2018-0833","title":"A meta-analysis of LHC results","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Large Hadron Collider; Raster graphics; Bitmap; Graphics; Statistical analysis; Atlas (anatomy); Fermilab","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03761784,0.001996045,0.006690261,0.00709905,0.001100667,0.003214998,0.002308558,0.001796913,0.006529706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07124698,0.001072027,0.02381918,0.01182421,0.0007337714,0.001743058,0.001656445,0.001626695,0.0005618385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001380684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001560128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006437026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009884082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9612125,0.02533429,0.0039656,0.005668898,0.002625914,0.001192849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8838175,0.09258487,0.007713653,0.01127928,0.003506124,0.001098536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00658644,0.00003226683,0.1020582,0.02341022,0.8518969,0.0006801312,0.0002182054,0.001515807,0.001114036,0.0006904074,0.003261336,0.008536128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007997387,0.0005072432,0.06739543,0.00221083,0.9217619,0.0003750807,0.0001829026,0.0008320616,0.000674878,0.001257787,0.003951699,0.00005047611],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3139679,0.6198019,0.01905002,0.003007545,0.001798519,0.0005942427,0.03689563,0.0004920712,0.004392216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638765,0.02275547,0.004804988,0.001154282,0.0005480343,0.0006527798,0.005287019,0.000202792,0.000718068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03761784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1989446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04636793402428222,"score_gpt":0.268444959243203,"score_spread":0.2220770252189208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}