{"id":"W2980835560","doi":"10.1002/edn3.35","title":"Comparing eDNA metabarcoding and species collection for documenting Arctic metazoan biodiversity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Churchill Northern Studies Centre; ArcticNet","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Arctic; Ecology; Phylum; Species richness; Biology; Invertebrate; Beta diversity; Marine biodiversity; DNA barcoding; Pelagic zone; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000263359,0.0002879269,0.0003205646,0.00006114881,0.0006792866,0.00006233712,0.0002176822,0.0000686856,0.002649442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001462494,0.0003052297,0.0001327619,0.0001052045,0.0004261439,0.0005092475,0.0009202732,0.0001357358,0.001503619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006612439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":9.858131e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001273392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002029705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982392,0.00005035809,0.0002259252,0.0006559682,0.000380497,0.0004481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994051,0.00009719589,0.000134401,0.0002385353,0.00000107624,0.000123727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003569171,0.0000774567,0.9356685,0.00002123885,0.00007375505,0.000001711026,0.0004876275,0.0000820214,0.06252015,0.00001788226,0.0007798608,0.0002341437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001124953,0.0001277813,0.9685383,0.00001167815,0.0001246983,0.000008423356,0.00170258,0.00028397,0.0138359,0.00007168404,0.01377434,0.0003956395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994654,0.0001364388,0.00007609368,0.0001431417,0.000247793,0.0007697053,0.00004405951,0.00004931284,0.003879475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919807,0.0001761992,0.004111693,0.0001608422,0.00002507409,0.00001933215,0.00004485649,0.00001449818,0.003466825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04868425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0172696622891152,"score_gpt":0.1903587254623572,"score_spread":0.173089063173242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}