{"id":"W2981250668","doi":"10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.105971","title":"1200 years of Upper Missouri River streamflow reconstructed from tree rings","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quaternary Science Reviews","topic":"Tree-ring climate responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Regina","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Streamflow; Structural basin; Drainage basin; Dendrochronology; Geology; Context (archaeology); Hydrology (agriculture); Physical geography; Climatology; Geography; Geomorphology; Paleontology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009442375,0.0001969736,0.0004871095,0.000222219,0.00008129582,0.00007247942,0.00094212,0.00006037662,0.004165542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002221292,0.0001566131,0.0001429875,0.0006444138,0.000571839,0.0006832824,0.00004552689,0.000138818,0.004703545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001595873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000140679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004457564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000295775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977222,0.0001618494,0.000538817,0.0005701009,0.0005342854,0.0004727666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985406,0.0002751187,0.0003086787,0.0006301309,0.00003577881,0.0002096759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002548904,0.000008684122,0.7098069,0.00002196748,0.000005060595,0.000007776999,0.0002046299,0.00002512116,0.002726925,0.000003368457,0.0000557845,0.2871084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002259347,0.0001146097,0.9725403,0.000284402,0.00001468805,0.00002006398,0.00004845909,0.00155646,0.001252259,0.0001941116,0.02352821,0.0002205129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915584,0.004217163,0.0000067366,0.00006173171,0.0005462948,0.0003406905,0.00009385288,0.00004015305,0.003135013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888522,0.003430479,0.006804537,0.00008709667,0.00006142062,0.000001213792,0.00002759974,0.000006470776,0.0007290025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2868879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02156756632990903,"score_gpt":0.246863648559621,"score_spread":0.225296082229712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}