{"id":"W2981308303","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071","title":"Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Sociology; Business; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006715762,0.0002198651,0.0004882598,0.003051007,0.001422835,0.002587606,0.0006555864,0.001366023,0.002881247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03307427,0.0002426966,0.0006327116,0.001956155,0.002926552,0.002208343,0.002228903,0.0007216986,0.0002700695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001617381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001719955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003280397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006169585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947825,0.002366792,0.0003274485,0.0002641677,0.0019891,0.0002700125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.936372,0.04254915,0.01245856,0.002021843,0.004368972,0.002229432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007180749,0.0005089894,0.9337874,0.0002918042,0.0002390386,0.0003107232,0.006769795,0.0003990914,0.001770329,0.003461707,0.0002211498,0.05152183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003398038,0.001112567,0.9762902,0.0001430647,0.0001822931,0.001072522,0.01200225,0.003073994,0.0006828058,0.00325428,0.002097047,0.00005495315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905275,0.0009211275,0.0006194729,0.0003785348,0.000007752433,0.00004348271,0.00003378376,0.000007472348,0.007460841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997884,0.0005549822,0.0006875345,0.0001024064,0.00001597831,0.00003317531,0.00002783615,0.000003402121,0.0006906384],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.998634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03551674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.586007628064981,"score_gpt":0.5768068421870614,"score_spread":0.009200785877919615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}