{"id":"W2981361409","doi":"10.1071/wr18122","title":"Estimating kangaroo density by aerial survey: a comparison of thermal cameras with human observers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lethbridge College","funders":"","keywords":"Aerial survey; Wildlife; Transect; Wildlife management; Geography; Population; Ecology; Distance sampling; Habitat; Animal ecology; Population density; Camera trap; Wildlife conservation; Human–wildlife conflict; Survey methodology; Photogrammetry; Remote sensing; Biology; Statistics; Demography; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002093626,0.0001161904,0.0002492128,0.00004245153,0.0002974726,0.00002662358,0.0003408391,0.000112442,0.001117098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001649159,0.0001008803,0.00003041121,0.000382825,0.0004876134,0.0001934282,0.0002227624,0.0003936241,0.00042591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001264799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005638502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008660092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003008126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975774,0.0006843804,0.0002503197,0.000339458,0.0007152387,0.0004332221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989999,0.0003946775,0.0001133296,0.0003362424,0.00005614996,0.00009969042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001434304,0.0001297066,0.9756958,0.00001226155,0.00001832301,0.000001579995,0.0003036852,0.001000523,0.007303975,0.00002464407,0.01503542,0.0003306635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000550068,0.0003391318,0.9945219,0.0000191764,0.000004646334,0.000001132843,0.000130684,0.003400229,0.0005706142,0.00002518669,0.000318701,0.0001185275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976427,0.000008782692,0.00004337533,0.0003095565,0.00008051376,0.0003615087,0.000009721952,0.00002152557,0.001522344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985816,5.226828e-7,0.0005792592,0.0001358105,0.00003651189,0.00001458217,0.00004728313,0.0000148055,0.0005896199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01882611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06558777232214827,"score_gpt":0.3466673594029797,"score_spread":0.2810795870808315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}