{"id":"W2981435607","doi":"10.4095/212448","title":"Magnetic anomaly map (residual total field), Wayow Lake, Saskatchewan, NTS 64M/13","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Geological Studies and Exploration","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Residual; Geology; Anomaly (physics); Computer science; Physics; Condensed matter physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004793109,0.0009424292,0.0003724926,0.002871507,0.001415724,0.0008595044,0.001376269,0.000380995,0.06744795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00149573,0.0006681198,0.0001830514,0.004718278,0.000287952,0.0008205715,0.0007125543,0.0006346403,0.02729476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003911201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01390242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8680139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9476016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999693,0.00002053831,0.00001775,0.00005634153,0.0001517555,0.00006064467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977587,0.0001026425,0.00009281844,0.0002004788,0.001629804,0.000215544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005429406,0.000272636,0.1108422,0.0002519802,0.00009030767,0.0006159146,0.0007125087,0.003205117,0.01182141,0.001518797,0.7503954,0.1197308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003340746,0.0001147852,0.6062658,0.0001972715,0.00009509016,0.0002245348,0.001748538,0.008373586,0.01153525,0.0009258789,0.3700664,0.0001187903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06755784,0.0001182829,0.003921407,0.0005251077,0.00009589224,0.000457385,0.7853683,0.003153935,0.1388019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1121833,0.0003864906,0.01248934,0.000208013,0.00003511171,0.000549946,0.5535513,0.0008354512,0.319761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1319861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2655267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02900055705194632,"score_gpt":0.221569516159367,"score_spread":0.1925689591074207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}