{"id":"W2981504739","doi":"10.7202/1055493ar","title":"The Emergence of a More Conventional Reading of the Conventionality Control Doctrine","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Legislation; Convention; Power (physics); Judicial review; Reading (process); Human rights; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007420592,0.0005896383,0.0007740742,0.002855084,0.003522974,0.01262408,0.002185044,0.007652556,0.004081092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009921972,0.0003733704,0.0006977707,0.003091536,0.0353109,0.01150347,0.003213391,0.02104693,0.0007628346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008731217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005024766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00790911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914395,0.002239707,0.0003712429,0.002259135,0.003060155,0.0006303351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933165,0.002963653,0.0005578878,0.001001028,0.001895534,0.0002653496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001317936,0.0000023378,0.00002038814,0.000004691199,5.770413e-7,0.000005595077,0.0002555981,0.00001900162,0.00003364071,0.9982399,0.0006724666,0.0007445028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001894716,0.00002342975,0.0002920869,0.00009564998,0.000005885071,0.00008078953,0.0003548487,0.000713075,0.0002910988,0.8939177,0.1041804,0.00002604189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0238729,0.007701633,0.1614073,0.09008889,0.003641007,0.0001269363,0.0002790251,0.0001585399,0.7127237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8694495,0.003148368,0.03107043,0.04122509,0.005244078,0.0004681378,0.0002307632,0.0002050038,0.04895855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01262408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06334972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01061946629356109,"score_gpt":0.2720095809627847,"score_spread":0.2613901146692236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}