{"id":"W2981605645","doi":"10.25258/ijpqa.10.3.18","title":"Comparative Study of Medical Device Vigilance in Canada, USA, Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance","topic":"Quality and Safety in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vigilance (psychology); Authorization; Business; Medical device; Medical emergency; Medical equipment; Marketing authorization; Warning system; Computer security; Risk analysis (engineering); Public relations; Marketing; Medicine; Engineering; Psychology; Nursing; Computer science; Political science; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001066065,0.000208571,0.0003765709,0.002432012,0.002130635,0.001406247,0.0006883584,0.00055107,0.002134367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006244841,0.0002661849,0.0004278221,0.004894838,0.0009122721,0.0004881981,0.0007858217,0.0007677451,0.0002181678],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01784513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02169662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9510348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9717435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980373,0.0002280094,0.0001695133,0.0001870113,0.0009780382,0.0004000605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932227,0.0005132232,0.001064038,0.00008483071,0.003853003,0.001262117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003524107,0.0001847825,0.9644844,0.0002089095,0.0001393648,0.0006297362,0.01119666,0.0001108583,0.0005999002,0.0006398606,0.001862844,0.01959029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004843253,0.0001038838,0.9936844,0.00002754508,0.00001923989,0.0001099707,0.004430121,0.00005773616,0.00004156375,0.00001138657,0.001501253,0.000008097465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898892,0.001314595,0.00009871183,0.0003438683,0.00003011942,0.00006430061,0.0006046343,0.000009561463,0.007645087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968596,0.0006235745,0.0001274838,0.0001481296,0.000007427111,0.00001563247,0.0002318946,0.000004689075,0.001981702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1294761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3921225444401263,"score_gpt":0.6239693061758356,"score_spread":0.2318467617357093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}