{"id":"W2981605645","doi":"10.25258/ijpqa.10.3.18","title":"Comparative Study of Medical Device Vigilance in Canada, USA, Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance","topic":"Quality and Safety in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vigilance (psychology); Authorization; Business; Medical device; Medical emergency; Medical equipment; Marketing authorization; Warning system; Computer security; Risk analysis (engineering); Public relations; Marketing; Medicine; Engineering; Psychology; Nursing; Computer science; Political science; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005116402,0.0001615149,0.0008085642,0.0001204083,0.0000609556,0.000006704695,0.001064454,0.0001497858,0.003240795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008207018,0.0001413534,0.00008636039,0.0002376222,0.0000681013,0.0002339934,0.0001217765,0.00193672,0.0001019918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009233842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003457562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5401386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8590218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907564,0.002921159,0.002635558,0.0002156698,0.003088946,0.0003822705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993176,0.003905373,0.00116452,0.0001863328,0.001252607,0.0003151579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001015458,0.0005641414,0.9883264,0.0003691321,0.000179798,0.0001054369,0.004672291,0.0004522895,0.0001772877,0.003019278,0.0007303086,0.0003881974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005060929,0.0001508698,0.9695034,0.001061143,0.00001524216,0.00001564333,0.01523957,0.000778745,0.000180587,0.0002157214,0.007604914,0.0001732481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843028,0.0001575521,0.00007896098,0.01107106,0.003218186,0.0004685271,0.00006438454,0.000003593239,0.0006349545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973056,0.00008348058,0.00007889401,0.002057281,0.000301174,0.000009480863,0.000002868512,0.000007303825,0.0001538752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3188832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3921225444401263,"score_gpt":0.6239693061758356,"score_spread":0.2318467617357093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}