{"id":"W2981747986","doi":"10.4095/212444","title":"Magnetic anomaly map (residual total field), Dutton Lake, Saskatchewan, NTS 64M/9","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Geological Studies and Exploration","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Residual; Anomaly (physics); Geology; Field (mathematics); Cartography; Geography; Mathematics; Algorithm; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004440605,0.0008716962,0.0003546326,0.00284776,0.001458379,0.0008097358,0.001345692,0.0003708706,0.06473547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001391073,0.0005757259,0.0001617656,0.004209793,0.0002854151,0.0006953922,0.0006974912,0.0005968104,0.02644756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003968462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01323893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8655887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.950559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996982,0.0000200112,0.00001525249,0.0000547979,0.0001553815,0.00005635671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997611,0.00009959302,0.00008470232,0.0001921197,0.001804665,0.0002078797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005117066,0.0002619334,0.1114235,0.0002440283,0.00008699687,0.0007227839,0.0006890777,0.003336108,0.01393261,0.001604666,0.7340447,0.1331418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002677363,0.0001105671,0.5936946,0.0001912973,0.00007875991,0.0002475286,0.001653342,0.007999527,0.01137386,0.0008515802,0.383428,0.0001031137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08110004,0.0001385056,0.004575673,0.0006134529,0.0001148826,0.0004813286,0.7328765,0.003409953,0.1766897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1237635,0.0003973696,0.01212091,0.0002428649,0.00003960959,0.0004658672,0.5031986,0.0007164075,0.359055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1344113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2704057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02805382393851441,"score_gpt":0.2243450270702459,"score_spread":0.1962912031317315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}