{"id":"W2981957561","doi":"10.4095/223273","title":"Residual total magnetic field, Jennings River aeromagnetic survey, British Columbia, 104 O/16, British Columbia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Aeromagnetic survey; Residual; Geology; Columbia university; River valley; Magnetic survey; Archaeology; Hydrology (agriculture); Geography; Magnetic anomaly; Geophysics; Magnetic field; Media studies; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006354668,0.0008646375,0.0006173292,0.004357332,0.003846704,0.00115832,0.002090455,0.0005964885,0.02578787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00240234,0.0005689792,0.0002867064,0.007076053,0.0004494829,0.0006233744,0.0008056643,0.001088007,0.008069618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01625321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0325604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992687,0.00005693063,0.0000578137,0.0001162692,0.0003512446,0.0001490079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968091,0.000170387,0.0001499394,0.0001130554,0.002452309,0.0003052112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002302239,0.0002324964,0.2307411,0.000523429,0.0001176067,0.0004548223,0.0009775192,0.001884403,0.0009339115,0.001065849,0.6456102,0.1172284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008017888,0.00002869815,0.8613844,0.0002937275,0.00006828675,0.0001348684,0.002092056,0.001563922,0.0008606514,0.0002179074,0.1332147,0.00006056851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1722306,0.003155307,0.001221966,0.001890463,0.0002683065,0.0008026295,0.6847261,0.0007755596,0.1349291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2056098,0.004046717,0.004462851,0.0005951346,0.00008329512,0.0005635363,0.2051044,0.0004004745,0.5791339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02578787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1179259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01866124940377239,"score_gpt":0.2395450924789079,"score_spread":0.2208838430751355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}