{"id":"W2982249510","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djz211","title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Bevacizumab in First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer: Lessons for Research and Regulatory Enterprises","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","topic":"Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology","field":"Medicine","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science; Arnold Ventures","keywords":"Bevacizumab; Medicine; Hazard ratio; Internal medicine; Oncology; Metastatic breast cancer; Meta-analysis; Proportional hazards model; Clinical trial; Breast cancer; Progression-free survival; Cancer; Confidence interval; Overall survival; Chemotherapy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0478841,0.002573854,0.01823003,0.007582349,0.0005978369,0.004102555,0.002431121,0.002380709,0.003327813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1142911,0.00141565,0.03136787,0.008685469,0.0009166363,0.002689121,0.001560285,0.0022021,0.0003462706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004527587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007461413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009676301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02083036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9595636,0.02712654,0.007672204,0.002126353,0.002874556,0.0006366522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.898725,0.0824818,0.009569254,0.002926787,0.005716147,0.0005810068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001324466,0.00001923959,0.003538824,0.3969834,0.5710379,0.0001846859,0.0001136897,0.0009587771,0.0001888173,0.0005082614,0.002073017,0.02306893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006922634,0.0001895633,0.004618303,0.09740603,0.8899862,0.0001310866,0.00007428966,0.0004074884,0.0001170084,0.001095137,0.005248537,0.00003407449],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015625,0.9964504,0.0005350234,0.0006193051,0.0001723377,0.0001565781,0.0002599283,0.00001824687,0.0002257413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1287515,0.8614641,0.004415687,0.002405525,0.0005492165,0.001297844,0.0007674817,0.0000517589,0.0002968101],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9521159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2532383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4801933040482415,"score_gpt":0.5622275174975023,"score_spread":0.08203421344926082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}