{"id":"W2982399179","doi":"10.1186/s12913-019-4580-5","title":"Working well: a systematic scoping review of the Indigenous primary healthcare workforce development literature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Health Services Research","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lowitja Institute","keywords":"Workforce; Indigenous; Workforce development; Thematic analysis; Health care; Medicine; Nursing; Teamwork; Sustainability; Health services research; Government (linguistics); Health administration; Systematic review; Public relations; Public health; Political science; MEDLINE; Qualitative research; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01526242,0.0001844231,0.0006967901,0.0002540885,0.007941569,0.0001359588,0.001191136,0.0002072086,0.00005525495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001374419,0.0001208239,0.00009865466,0.002474514,0.0001199345,0.0001934485,0.00002622218,0.0007073652,0.000163145],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001409478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08886429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02103043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4184262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896598,0.005049014,0.001205201,0.0004456846,0.002189954,0.001450326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964215,0.0008073738,0.0006498871,0.000792775,0.00092831,0.0004002153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007448898,0.00004133749,0.005338451,0.5808277,0.000005288156,3.50581e-7,0.410941,7.393992e-7,1.144838e-7,0.002645565,0.000003965946,0.0001879936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012933,0.000053747,0.002382016,0.9497045,0.000004058422,0.000003007099,0.01645983,0.000002839197,0.000008501609,0.00006570471,0.03104046,0.0001460473],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.201275,0.7212501,0.00001438029,0.001474943,0.002059037,0.03187464,0.000005176141,0.0001097387,0.041937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1771063,0.7923754,0.002115368,0.005727119,0.001026478,0.0003111805,0.00009083358,0.0001010529,0.02114623],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3973958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05832908300666064,"score_gpt":0.4191781118516755,"score_spread":0.3608490288450149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}