{"id":"W2982584497","doi":"10.1109/apusncursinrsm.2019.8889233","title":"Evaluation of an Inversion Algorithm for Noninvasive Specific Absorption Rate Applications","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Imaging phantom; Specific absorption rate; Inversion (geology); Inverse problem; Transverse plane; Algorithm; Computer science; Electromagnetic field; Inverse; Magnetic field; Absorption (acoustics); Physics; Optics; Mathematics; Engineering; Telecommunications; Mathematical analysis; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001850293,0.0005960859,0.0003776224,0.0004820695,0.0002873657,0.0007094429,0.0006328296,0.0007768032,0.001838345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00535355,0.000183943,0.0002059585,0.0003366977,0.0002595806,0.0007440162,0.0004318678,0.000478404,0.0003887876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004116732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001150409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002095246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002004894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994374,0.0001561144,0.00002576503,0.00004933692,0.0003010361,0.00003029208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976861,0.001162984,0.0001122472,0.0001172189,0.0008732103,0.00004815191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001156334,0.0004626243,0.003675678,0.0002727859,0.0001367885,0.0001870105,0.0001787585,0.4314394,0.1289738,0.01076702,0.001658749,0.421091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004024982,0.0002604779,0.0006258243,0.00001104597,0.00001822132,0.000109924,0.00002177449,0.9641647,0.03279087,0.000530287,0.001411862,0.00001482774],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.05838737,0.0001298649,0.9386349,0.0001192859,0.00002642319,0.0001533911,0.00005219668,0.0007428296,0.001753789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2203133,0.0001403205,0.7770512,0.00004653854,0.00001305907,0.0001354036,0.0001626736,0.0002028349,0.001934757],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002095246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009785414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01779617121256482,"score_gpt":0.2413081828406311,"score_spread":0.2235120116280663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}