{"id":"W2982584497","doi":"10.1109/apusncursinrsm.2019.8889233","title":"Evaluation of an Inversion Algorithm for Noninvasive Specific Absorption Rate Applications","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Imaging phantom; Specific absorption rate; Inversion (geology); Inverse problem; Transverse plane; Algorithm; Computer science; Electromagnetic field; Inverse; Magnetic field; Absorption (acoustics); Physics; Optics; Mathematics; Engineering; Telecommunications; Mathematical analysis; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003304475,0.00005840436,0.00007341329,0.00008125809,0.00001708084,0.000006730165,0.00005636352,0.00004355468,0.0001073254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002091582,0.00005120213,0.00004479681,0.0002387874,0.00000856911,0.0001069172,0.000003654665,0.0000334227,0.00004977205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003425344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001090866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003116851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002936133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995106,0.00001787895,0.0001097045,0.0001062708,0.0001639536,0.00009160905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996027,0.00002933905,0.00002263227,0.000120593,0.0001961264,0.00002858443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000400908,0.00004272411,0.00005042682,0.00002956383,0.00002307012,2.66933e-8,0.00002798834,0.003836886,0.1443055,0.0004931382,0.0003904748,0.8507962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004893413,0.0001053642,0.0006991961,0.000005481128,0.00003163741,3.983764e-7,0.0000344517,0.8493192,0.14484,0.002322499,0.00205819,0.0000942596],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6782499,0.0003185029,0.3143359,0.00002136653,0.0001458321,0.001685338,0.0000234884,0.0001818546,0.005037854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845808,0.00009371088,0.01488488,0.00001544432,0.0000820702,0.0001527813,0.00008561812,0.00001287479,0.00009187054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.850702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2087962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01779617121256482,"score_gpt":0.2413081828406311,"score_spread":0.2235120116280663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}