{"id":"W2983006972","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2019.10.030","title":"Improved Myocardial Function With Coronary Sinus Reducer in a Patient With Refractory Angina and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Pain Management and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Ejection fraction; Cardiology; Internal medicine; Coronary sinus; Reducer; Angina; Heart failure; Ischemic cardiomyopathy; Perfusion; Cardiomyopathy; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Cardiac function curve; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardial infarction; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001946019,0.0006722234,0.0009249877,0.0007157159,0.0009775981,0.0006493875,0.0006225793,0.00228173,0.001940019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001306851,0.0002843016,0.0008577511,0.0004546131,0.0005648575,0.0004097178,0.0003841355,0.001884827,0.0003238225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007217918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000665296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002286947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005726198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998097,0.00002575866,0.00002483341,0.00003296453,0.00003511918,0.00007171633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996669,0.00008146028,0.00004012374,0.00001196914,0.00001553182,0.0001839989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004005905,0.001925495,0.1232316,0.0001681709,0.0001631349,0.8384008,0.000432691,0.0004453016,0.007955362,0.0007734422,0.002257162,0.02024094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001591863,0.008864759,0.3400716,0.0001406911,0.0002698915,0.6409509,0.0006971047,0.002868581,0.001309725,0.0009554096,0.002187733,0.00009174945],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820015,0.002020082,0.0004698424,0.005981821,0.0003013476,0.00008563175,0.0001742886,0.00005212431,0.008913376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954872,0.001096481,0.0004233202,0.001554549,0.0005489468,0.00001699218,0.0001280507,0.000007044886,0.0007374635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002286947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006489992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005697359429645037,"score_gpt":0.1977737616354134,"score_spread":0.1920764022057684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}