{"id":"W2983309011","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.11.002","title":"Behavioural and neural interactions between objective and subjective performance in a Matching Pennies game","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Optimism; Psychology; Contingency; Matching (statistics); Negativity effect; Social psychology; Contrast (vision); Ultimatum game; Contingency table; Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007082854,0.0002390588,0.0003244059,0.0001885264,0.0001308514,0.0009721974,0.0002699413,0.000484522,0.00222366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007269795,0.0003041948,0.0001158424,0.0001715043,0.0003539051,0.0004261931,0.0005042247,0.0006245108,0.0001726357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002479125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002094924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001365519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001532408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996897,0.0001337781,0.00001844575,0.00005930233,0.00005683492,0.00004190117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976204,0.001510167,0.0003378548,0.0000882808,0.00007028546,0.0003729792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02148555,0.005162031,0.220858,0.0003577154,0.001068804,0.0006349948,0.001554638,0.04162448,0.6512942,0.009841715,0.001329516,0.04478838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003039399,0.002232636,0.8014883,0.00001616532,0.000129343,0.0001948123,0.0002684103,0.1823694,0.006534691,0.006137603,0.0002711204,0.00005352108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987839,0.00001129053,0.0006439186,0.00003636621,0.00000454564,0.000008083218,0.00002731898,0.000004715902,0.0004798713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989381,0.00001285714,0.000524923,0.00002210473,0.000003695307,0.00001197078,0.00003431584,0.000004899625,0.0004471163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00222366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007438898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0723373270005191,"score_gpt":0.4048913966515185,"score_spread":0.3325540696509994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}