{"id":"W2983309011","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.11.002","title":"Behavioural and neural interactions between objective and subjective performance in a Matching Pennies game","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Optimism; Psychology; Contingency; Matching (statistics); Negativity effect; Social psychology; Contrast (vision); Ultimatum game; Contingency table; Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005885713,0.0001180917,0.0003457969,0.000611537,0.00003228083,0.0001386807,0.0004427382,0.00005821697,0.00008915738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001754956,0.00009007025,0.00008412565,0.0001273066,0.0001006016,0.0008021967,0.0001337641,0.0003820755,0.00002899671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007203402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003351561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006625566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004773362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984585,0.0001118382,0.0006963605,0.0002598341,0.0003391713,0.0001343049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979939,0.0009110678,0.0005394288,0.0001206584,0.0003717541,0.00006323079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004254245,0.00005664105,0.8800079,0.000001033179,0.00003764159,0.00001769378,0.001728438,0.0002887246,0.00341451,0.000049047,0.00002795611,0.113945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007609084,0.0002975226,0.9671504,0.00004429328,0.000008399298,0.0002513671,0.001276647,0.0005364945,0.00008041214,0.02938261,0.0001159914,0.00009487952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971001,0.00004784771,0.00007057204,0.0004892074,0.001988659,0.00006785704,0.00001329583,0.000003800982,0.0002186655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993362,0.00004352053,0.000262098,0.000107682,0.0001731709,0.000001577639,0.000001405529,0.000007121972,0.00006715759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1138501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3672958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0723373270005191,"score_gpt":0.4048913966515185,"score_spread":0.3325540696509994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}