{"id":"W2983592023","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101747","title":"Methodological strategies for evaluating youth gang prevention programs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Public Safety Canada","keywords":"Documentation; Fidelity; Psychological intervention; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Program evaluation; Suicide prevention; Work (physics); Occupational safety and health; Data collection; Program Design Language; Injury prevention; Medical education; Psychology; Applied psychology; Public relations; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Nursing; Environmental health; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4293292,0.004929485,0.004442009,0.01209775,0.005729519,0.009007684,0.007075534,0.003333609,0.009894663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6566493,0.003187557,0.007149694,0.01038588,0.005742684,0.005754539,0.009340147,0.00464412,0.0009804216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01395294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02443181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0139828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02130454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3738676,0.5307375,0.05883582,0.00836967,0.02665447,0.001534966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4030375,0.4250315,0.03300133,0.06570919,0.07072476,0.002495745],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004392929,0.003902902,0.04682878,0.02834616,0.01298947,0.0002640399,0.01706505,0.01296051,0.00350685,0.3217926,0.01519642,0.5327544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01417705,0.01232429,0.0475869,0.02368324,0.02470437,0.0006331522,0.02245892,0.08593316,0.02267393,0.630456,0.1143434,0.001025614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01219805,0.003208675,0.8904739,0.002224078,0.000823781,0.07833552,0.00190528,0.0003523666,0.01047837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04599141,0.0004992568,0.7762119,0.0006925138,0.0001083994,0.17498,0.000501541,0.00007658937,0.000938475],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4293292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7037387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6903532094422351,"score_gpt":0.6223759202779743,"score_spread":0.06797728916426082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}