{"id":"W2984416749","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104617","title":"A review of methods and data to determine raw material criticality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","topic":"Extraction and Separation Processes","field":"Engineering","cited_by":300,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"EIT RawMaterials; Horizon 2020; European Commission","keywords":"Criticality; Identification (biology); Risk analysis (engineering); Vulnerability (computing); Representativeness heuristic; Scope (computer science); Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Field (mathematics); Raw data; Business; Computer security; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02324459,0.002130229,0.00478544,0.02377917,0.0009682628,0.004598069,0.003415996,0.002620333,0.008840918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08974428,0.001336764,0.004426375,0.01784413,0.002484414,0.005324598,0.002216,0.00322794,0.002552343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005484812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01982537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005224253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01065924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9813902,0.005087894,0.00576752,0.001358321,0.006078223,0.0003177939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8679005,0.1045827,0.009985976,0.003271278,0.01367486,0.0005847033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001048512,0.00006603042,0.0005091118,0.5727476,0.001167869,0.00015809,0.0003857816,0.000426307,0.000569255,0.009624037,0.01671797,0.3975231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003439975,0.000172189,0.00251787,0.4844142,0.003289936,0.0004885669,0.0003890213,0.0001546774,0.0008011417,0.008201996,0.4994493,0.00008666517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002059843,0.9935272,0.001818103,0.0009897096,0.0003957312,0.0003294202,0.0006559173,0.00002854108,0.002049486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002314057,0.9918051,0.003613159,0.0007506708,0.0001585831,0.0006043452,0.0004663577,0.00001709744,0.0002705207],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02377917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1229306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2288523232691628,"score_gpt":0.4669780879097403,"score_spread":0.2381257646405775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}