{"id":"W2986174722","doi":"10.1504/ijram.2019.103333","title":"The evolution of regulatory practice for CCS projects in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"National Academy of Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; McGill University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Carbon Management Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Documentation; Transparency (behavior); Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management; Carbon capture and storage (timeline); Business; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental science; Computer security; Finance; Climate change","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03421681,0.0005868988,0.000595598,0.01069719,0.009441908,0.01225369,0.005001971,0.002019053,0.002510927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06799705,0.0008324854,0.0008686631,0.0159519,0.007215538,0.002150391,0.002347319,0.002980727,0.0003786484],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2739058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4555549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9386449,0.005556505,0.003298518,0.003939449,0.04423196,0.004328543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7887377,0.0219947,0.01062418,0.003453888,0.1695326,0.005657053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002488787,0.0002287969,0.04660902,0.003849542,0.0001939264,0.001271337,0.02730769,0.01319991,0.009061216,0.117071,0.1036965,0.6772621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000425137,0.0001940561,0.1355698,0.004607075,0.0001268325,0.000377879,0.01563198,0.003469736,0.005402315,0.004553783,0.8294888,0.0005352193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3699053,0.1193981,0.03118279,0.1192687,0.002082534,0.001245142,0.00713335,0.001898618,0.3478855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8848077,0.04739581,0.02280151,0.008650549,0.0001560421,0.0002847491,0.002387282,0.0004069537,0.03310942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2739058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8421664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00599747744338002,"score_gpt":0.2818884945465543,"score_spread":0.2758910171031743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}