{"id":"W2986406282","doi":"10.1080/22020586.2019.12072978","title":"Using machine learning to interpret 3D airborne electromagnetic inversions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASEG Extended Abstracts","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western Forest Products; BC Hydro (Canada); Geoscience BC; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Inversion (geology); A priori and a posteriori; Computer science; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Pixel; Synthetic data; Regularization (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy); Machine learning; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009553878,0.0006689933,0.0003985493,0.001043585,0.0003728054,0.001113928,0.0006179741,0.0007165516,0.001989749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003581143,0.0003739956,0.0007144412,0.0005099528,0.0005052037,0.0008753572,0.0007334187,0.0009577377,0.0005608158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007496522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006023865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004225159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004385563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996806,0.0001165395,0.00001668198,0.00008029938,0.00007089086,0.00003495644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987424,0.0006583528,0.0001073486,0.0001720829,0.0002877311,0.00003199865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004025105,0.00003410034,0.002229595,0.00002187193,0.00003697881,0.00004818918,0.00005085488,0.9117324,0.005133355,0.003144953,0.0007853794,0.07674208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001315941,0.0000025842,0.0001076813,0.000001841951,9.012834e-7,0.000003854444,0.000003399728,0.9977937,0.0006016776,0.001319972,0.0001607706,0.000002275543],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05001852,0.00005656172,0.9456376,0.0001689615,0.00005120183,0.00003219687,0.0001182462,0.001839846,0.002076965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6414997,0.00005074224,0.3560523,0.0001059087,0.0000339433,0.00005845367,0.000351136,0.0002327419,0.001615023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004225159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008401155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01582657005552447,"score_gpt":0.2514695281012532,"score_spread":0.2356429580457287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}