{"id":"W2987154563","doi":"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.101128","title":"Stability of international environmental agreements under isoelastic utility","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resource and Energy Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Damages; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Economics; Scale (ratio); Stability (learning theory); Function (biology); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science; Geology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00677044,0.0004120505,0.001683026,0.001473023,0.001512171,0.005904538,0.001497001,0.002201202,0.01037965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03765767,0.0005943964,0.0008976442,0.001802096,0.003167717,0.006051137,0.002320623,0.003713258,0.0006157485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003735734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002178144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00782354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005134084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980159,0.0009358022,0.00008880472,0.0002590755,0.0002734828,0.0004270091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741666,0.01700656,0.004285905,0.001275317,0.001885013,0.001380616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003647051,0.00006775316,0.002057252,0.00003580243,0.00003883864,0.0001372531,0.0002670462,0.1072926,0.0002568513,0.8823997,0.001925707,0.005156513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000621451,0.00004675287,0.001379647,0.00001629087,0.00001890917,0.0000312476,0.000343963,0.1773862,0.000139553,0.8197463,0.000807558,0.00002148603],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8500011,0.0005735045,0.07449102,0.006117641,0.0001220831,0.00008708281,0.0006030949,0.0002396279,0.06776482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940527,0.0001621325,0.0009176301,0.00009557804,0.00003657187,0.00002350971,0.00008269784,0.00002134358,0.004607758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01037965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04006824344447967,"score_gpt":0.1970086599712475,"score_spread":0.1569404165267678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}