{"id":"W2987299426","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106320","title":"Methodological pluralism in environmental impact prediction and significance evaluation: A case for standardization?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Standardization; Terminology; Predictability; Management science; Process (computing); Pluralism (philosophy); Discretion; Context (archaeology); Process management; Scrutiny; Computer science; Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Engineering; Geography; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002944212,0.0006349484,0.0008940257,0.00007869649,0.0002480369,0.0000881399,0.0002488277,0.0002005602,0.01951774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005923157,0.0005154829,0.0003971103,0.000228659,0.0003138491,0.001067638,0.0003241617,0.0003693991,0.0001804997],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004503759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005263733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001738742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001837952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995378,0.0008867722,0.0008886815,0.0009813543,0.001114802,0.0007504354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983287,0.0003215172,0.0004069188,0.000537143,0.00000318668,0.0004024695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006912648,0.0006338587,0.9542568,0.0001447761,0.0001234772,0.00006294855,0.0002743252,0.00247134,0.01303397,0.0000126554,0.0008838045,0.02803295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002712037,0.001119217,0.9857789,0.0002919502,0.0002767536,0.0004488291,0.0003304147,0.005041197,0.000161848,0.000284697,0.002837538,0.0007165732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986348,0.004657436,0.0009506869,0.0002264569,0.0001730721,0.00591945,0.0007282684,0.00003949875,0.0009570962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855364,0.009585602,0.002776823,0.0005057285,0.00005999321,0.000644758,0.0005831045,0.00006146309,0.0002461471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03152218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06651358748007981,"score_gpt":0.4290182377034952,"score_spread":0.3625046502234154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}