{"id":"W2987362477","doi":"10.1186/s12939-019-1074-3","title":"Defining ‘actionable’ high- costhealth care use: results using the Canadian Institute for Health Information population grouping methodology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Equity in Health","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; McGill University; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Saskatchewan Health Authority; University of Toronto; Saskatchewan Health; University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Quality Council; Canadian Institute for Health Information; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ministry of Health, Saskatchewan","keywords":"Medicine; Health care; Population health; Health economics; Health administration; Population; Health services research; Public health; Environmental health; Health informatics; Health policy; Gerontology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0255455,0.001367799,0.001121761,0.01151949,0.002212107,0.002505814,0.003419726,0.0009362904,0.003459999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04877864,0.000409426,0.004099176,0.02643028,0.00114087,0.001219642,0.004889706,0.001380357,0.0004429999],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01618902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04246415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9305362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9011582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9764007,0.006413628,0.001687001,0.002140878,0.01097251,0.002385161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793664,0.005617823,0.003550471,0.002201468,0.008356752,0.0009071968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001824742,0.00008472723,0.95542,0.0008053371,0.001107599,0.00005738511,0.002510848,0.002290015,0.000106829,0.00372669,0.01479849,0.01890976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002345749,0.00005383261,0.9850522,0.0001440939,0.0002169316,0.00003106671,0.002241839,0.003724366,0.0001297657,0.0006108152,0.007726993,0.00004478566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6474801,0.004821801,0.03242682,0.002456072,0.0002357311,0.007537593,0.272298,0.0007457053,0.03199816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9053359,0.0007272669,0.02987572,0.0003053917,0.00003522717,0.003990114,0.05817958,0.0001153629,0.001435448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.983811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1397457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6491357270543889,"score_gpt":0.5703534632953505,"score_spread":0.0787822637590384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}