{"id":"W2988170504","doi":"10.1101/845784","title":"The immunogenic potential of recurrent cancer drug resistance mutations: an <i>in silico</i> study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Cancer Research","funders":"","keywords":"In silico; Context (archaeology); Immunotherapy; Cancer; Somatic cell; Drug resistance; Biology; Mutation; Antigen; Cancer immunotherapy; Population; Gene; Computational biology; Cancer research; Immunology; Genetics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007454466,0.0003703788,0.0003850423,0.00008770746,0.000143919,0.0001228153,0.0008203922,0.0002320821,0.000004455234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007574401,0.0003184799,0.0001523652,0.0002164447,0.00007656652,0.00001532844,0.0005047172,0.0003908568,0.000004490069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007516735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005589528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001153629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001385906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978617,0.0001841029,0.0007540538,0.0005650784,0.0002691351,0.0003658923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973742,0.00001648644,0.0005643516,0.001614718,0.0003631381,0.00006707407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003892673,0.0006635294,0.009280939,0.0004002114,0.0004217922,0.000003520953,0.000101385,0.001451123,0.9867473,0.00007235247,0.0004529011,0.00001563828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004079492,0.0005531359,0.3126879,0.0007378351,0.0004307443,3.730094e-8,0.0005779483,0.002321609,0.6672128,0.000008127826,0.009378422,0.002011948],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846515,0.01284494,0.00008668062,0.0000846682,0.0009373924,0.001235834,0.0001336737,0.00001953232,0.000005762734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967498,0.00223486,0.000389695,0.00002757416,0.0001526744,0.0003450076,0.000003025754,0.00006249963,0.00003490572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3195345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009545977759648423,"score_gpt":0.2335444354462447,"score_spread":0.2239984576865963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}