{"id":"W2988409343","doi":"10.1080/10350330.2019.1681062","title":"Sustainability in architectural design projects – a semiotic understanding","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Semiotics","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Deductive reasoning; Abductive reasoning; Semiotics; Semiosis; Sustainability; Sustainable design; Process (computing); Architecture; Status quo; Design process; Management science; Architectural engineering; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Engineering; Work in process; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005121611,0.0001254389,0.0001635365,0.00009814856,0.00005893069,0.00004866412,0.0001091206,0.0001052009,0.00007495174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002513575,0.0001367198,0.00004167179,0.0003900654,0.00003110306,0.0001319215,0.00001690754,0.0003161101,0.00004735628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001129187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001533046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002330265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000228303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990391,0.0001584805,0.0001824709,0.0001460394,0.0001423584,0.0003315529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993427,0.0004185541,0.00003090174,0.0001243409,0.00003398006,0.00004956311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004640594,0.0007406303,0.07213943,0.004286092,0.0003792798,0.00009018585,0.1661645,0.5138881,0.006588407,0.1693255,0.03578129,0.03015244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00631215,0.0005190278,0.1129331,0.0003547964,0.0002309128,0.0001077722,0.1498944,0.4367362,0.003799387,0.262755,0.02190034,0.004456841],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7744991,0.0002113158,0.1616176,0.004461037,0.002548454,0.002602742,0.000005509849,0.0008691521,0.05318516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985957,0.000005827282,0.0009138481,0.00008075228,0.0001019282,0.000006332638,0.000002891956,0.00002703452,0.0002657364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2240966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5575272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05418184275863287,"score_gpt":0.2868427286124753,"score_spread":0.2326608858538425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}