{"id":"W2988636700","doi":"10.1016/j.jcou.2019.10.019","title":"Structure and CO2 physisorption capacity of hydrotalcite-derived oxide","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of CO2 Utilization","topic":"Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Centre for Clean Coal/Carbon and Mineral Processing Technologies","keywords":"Physisorption; Adsorption; Hydrotalcite; Amorphous solid; Crystallinity; Calcination; Materials science; Oxide; Chemical engineering; Inorganic chemistry; Chemical physics; Chemistry; Crystallography; Physical chemistry; Organic chemistry; Composite material; Catalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003941442,0.0001329994,0.00006928523,0.0001999931,0.00009895012,0.0001221996,0.0001890282,0.0001599656,0.001785346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001609568,0.00007687527,0.00006876248,0.0001479702,0.0001276529,0.0001222911,0.00006357867,0.0001839241,0.00012072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001465583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001211194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002829368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999971,0.000001268868,0.000001397334,0.000006930444,0.00001005023,0.000009352624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999512,0.00001149284,0.00001086354,0.000003131504,0.00001492485,0.000008407027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002592062,0.00001939957,0.001139222,0.00006043891,0.000007167835,0.0001076108,0.00003471996,0.0003354497,0.996229,0.0001370621,0.0001168822,0.001553878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001423892,0.0002916855,0.02069771,0.000005956958,0.00001885804,0.00007807141,0.00008376272,0.003266581,0.9745341,0.00004988476,0.0009504227,0.000008748199],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991831,0.00008252616,0.00007334655,0.000008545604,0.000003128466,0.000002016106,0.0001434632,0.000004650913,0.0004991557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991528,0.00005624459,0.00005168726,0.000003840809,0.000001490894,0.000002114085,0.0002884936,0.000002127865,0.0004411471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005972564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01309394495218279,"score_gpt":0.2069711844367973,"score_spread":0.1938772394846145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}