{"id":"W2988636700","doi":"10.1016/j.jcou.2019.10.019","title":"Structure and CO2 physisorption capacity of hydrotalcite-derived oxide","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of CO2 Utilization","topic":"Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Centre for Clean Coal/Carbon and Mineral Processing Technologies","keywords":"Physisorption; Adsorption; Hydrotalcite; Amorphous solid; Crystallinity; Calcination; Materials science; Oxide; Chemical engineering; Inorganic chemistry; Chemical physics; Chemistry; Crystallography; Physical chemistry; Organic chemistry; Composite material; Catalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000778744,0.00009746822,0.0002293485,0.0001633905,0.000005865083,0.00001299565,0.00008490462,0.0001135771,0.00002332014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006433987,0.00008854898,0.00005195287,0.0001733812,0.00003978587,0.0002235837,0.00001544642,0.0001589231,9.925554e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000468645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009689001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002462922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004360154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993723,0.00001483599,0.0002884686,0.00006124191,0.0001793672,0.00008378449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994854,0.00002832413,0.0002021916,0.000123003,0.0001348393,0.0000262581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001483298,0.000006122701,0.003824278,0.00009265627,0.00003607749,7.81885e-7,0.0001287642,0.02623255,0.9684972,0.0003653319,0.00007955584,0.0007218791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005892761,0.00007941478,0.04942056,0.0001134367,0.00004483903,0.00005588313,0.0001667695,0.02015567,0.9268928,0.002146928,0.0002024788,0.0001319664],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996133,0.0005068425,0.002862332,0.00002350032,0.0001852283,0.00009628628,0.000005968644,0.0000663649,0.0001204743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991018,0.000181722,0.0006561772,0.000008771111,0.00002732462,4.038305e-7,0.000002409588,0.00001515088,0.000006294621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04559628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3610923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01309394495218279,"score_gpt":0.2069711844367973,"score_spread":0.1938772394846145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}