{"id":"W2988768477","doi":"10.1088/1755-1315/344/1/012002","title":"Maximum entropy method for flood frequency analysis: A case study of the Grand River in Ontario, Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science","topic":"Hydrology and Drought Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Flood myth; Akaike information criterion; Principle of maximum entropy; Bayesian information criterion; Probability distribution; Statistics; Entropy (arrow of time); Hydrology (agriculture); Frequency distribution; 100-year flood; Generalized extreme value distribution; Extreme value theory; Mathematics; Computer science; Geography; Geology; Geotechnical engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004153657,0.0001666129,0.0002986463,0.00006806836,0.0002916116,0.00002741908,0.0003612429,0.00004537594,0.001292922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001288687,0.0001215264,0.00006498846,0.0005923877,0.000809669,0.0003836487,0.0002602572,0.0001458381,0.00000574531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001571022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001364164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9256732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983096,0.00008917067,0.0002738669,0.000539208,0.0004178896,0.0003702885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993303,0.00004389383,0.0001180312,0.0003824962,0.000004587574,0.0001206643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003348586,0.0001338459,0.9852477,0.000002501497,0.00005032097,0.00004432307,0.003574234,0.002372859,0.00778447,0.00003384365,0.000003551717,0.0007188853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008506074,0.0003092895,0.9863718,0.00000363168,0.000214386,0.00008610435,0.005143665,0.002314164,0.003864296,0.0004091428,0.0002145635,0.0002183114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987062,0.0000130992,0.00007020569,0.00006220731,0.00006980812,0.0004917905,0.00001874799,0.000004405622,0.0005634921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984816,0.00000505724,0.0009015761,0.00008022827,0.000002848252,0.00002211457,0.000002845726,0.000004518682,0.0004991753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07051662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007924510775751752,"score_gpt":0.2045341510292088,"score_spread":0.196609640253457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}