{"id":"W2989586924","doi":"10.1289/isesisee.2018.p03.3630","title":"Regional Priorization of Contaminants of Interest in Environmental Health Based on Human Biomonitoring Data","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISEE Conference Abstracts","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Biomonitoring; Context (archaeology); Environmental health; Percentile; Risk assessment; Prioritization; Population; Human health; Environmental science; Medicine; Computer science; Geography; Statistics; Mathematics; Environmental chemistry; Engineering; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003223976,0.0001371817,0.0002135194,0.00005688158,0.00007326194,0.00001088335,0.0004254221,0.00006783786,0.000535722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002144184,0.0001360086,0.00002537646,0.00009548079,0.0004759482,0.000301531,0.0001982251,0.0001071196,0.00005815768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002227305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003681058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001182856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000878504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986715,0.00006621349,0.0004451042,0.000309876,0.0002732373,0.0002340614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990835,0.00004333717,0.0003557405,0.0004153887,0.000003539213,0.00009855977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008168907,0.001285297,0.689392,0.00004016003,0.0000154522,0.000007454551,0.001528293,0.001113002,0.2841807,0.0001492501,0.0001991542,0.02200763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005004961,0.0003758439,0.9823396,0.0001439604,0.000003884732,4.668551e-7,0.000283863,0.0002769204,0.01568326,0.0001131331,0.0001633155,0.0001152199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981686,0.000006245172,0.00007928773,0.00009929127,0.00009378348,0.0002034867,0.00006809812,0.000006702982,0.001274545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994563,0.00002097325,0.0002176753,0.00008389814,0.00004216785,0.000002529797,0.0001190435,0.00001072071,0.00004669775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2929477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.586578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1996477322474503,"score_gpt":0.3806739470105623,"score_spread":0.181026214763112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}