{"id":"W2990016774","doi":"10.1111/risa.13409","title":"People, Pipelines, and Probabilities: Clarifying Significance and Uncertainty in Environmental Impact Assessments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Casual; Construct (python library); Action (physics); Pipeline (software); Environmental impact assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science; Psychology; Environmental resource management; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Business; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004337554,0.0002521525,0.0004339354,0.0001078959,0.0001480406,0.00006882332,0.0001363281,0.0001122583,0.002189714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001744564,0.0002170065,0.0001372165,0.0005231522,0.0001848182,0.0004089833,0.0002398736,0.0002542165,0.00009483179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005886733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009609019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01095202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002949187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981647,0.0001807367,0.0003162259,0.0005665898,0.0003838047,0.0003880126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992618,0.0001261575,0.0001591396,0.0002710717,0.000001320738,0.0001805317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001980099,0.0001197669,0.9824455,0.00000713666,0.0001599621,0.000001937998,0.0009918219,0.01141589,0.001317736,0.000003376145,0.00001242034,0.003504645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004580546,0.00008375086,0.9743747,0.00000539702,0.0002515681,0.000001138294,0.001610015,0.02257218,0.00001953793,0.0002992103,0.00007176426,0.0002526931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985452,0.00013198,0.0001227003,0.00003155192,0.00002319579,0.0003662505,0.00007158889,0.0000152434,0.0006923384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981585,0.0008271818,0.0003985885,0.00005627059,0.00001286034,0.00002268263,0.00004357737,0.0000154349,0.0004649385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01115629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006153907944951992,"score_gpt":0.2700266410999765,"score_spread":0.2638727331550245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}