{"id":"W2990086724","doi":"10.1289/isesisee.2018.p03.2410","title":"Towards a Systematic Review of Environmental Injustice in Canada: National Patterns of Environmental Risks and Benefits","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"ISEE Conference Abstracts","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental justice; Injustice; Geography; Socioeconomic status; Residence; Census; Indigenous; Scale (ratio); Population; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Regional science; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Ecology; Cartography; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06369395,0.001317125,0.00697274,0.06921586,0.004400976,0.009793522,0.005719786,0.002454576,0.00206502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2259988,0.002007992,0.004913538,0.08668717,0.003929794,0.006283593,0.005616789,0.002585221,0.0003369106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08422878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3374622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.796418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9374019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9329968,0.01654304,0.02694781,0.003960676,0.01740118,0.002150419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7579997,0.09838087,0.03135789,0.007463254,0.09985954,0.004938671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001768158,0.00003111255,0.01667547,0.7751018,0.005044732,0.0004653135,0.009408815,0.0004634584,0.0006409914,0.003266928,0.02174709,0.1669774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007786533,0.00004826946,0.03106773,0.8795391,0.00718807,0.0002055326,0.004840369,0.0002121423,0.0001912695,0.0009480829,0.07560022,0.00008132078],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006193897,0.9709309,0.002189567,0.005303878,0.0006716272,0.003089124,0.008244262,0.00006563308,0.003311205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05296262,0.9120752,0.01562057,0.004998564,0.0001923764,0.006971604,0.006145303,0.00005629263,0.000977462],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.203582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6111254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.102311537595001,"score_gpt":0.3455131088669487,"score_spread":0.2432015712719477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}