{"id":"W2990187114","doi":"10.3389/fmars.2019.00728","title":"Peeling the Otolith of Fish: Optimal Parameterization for Micro-CT Scanning","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Marine Science","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica; Universidade de Pernambuco; Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Hounsfield scale; Otolith; Tomography; Computed tomography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Densitometry; Segmentation; Computer science; Biology; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Fishery; Radiology; Medicine; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007766928,0.00006709647,0.0001108708,0.000063931,0.0001761252,0.00001799759,0.0004245344,0.00001174434,0.0001001443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001234749,0.00005117277,0.00002306968,0.0004419359,0.0006245885,0.0002477373,0.0006121729,0.00005492159,0.000007889248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007512468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001144784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003804541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002350987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999176,0.00001660178,0.0001437599,0.0002537197,0.0001607401,0.0002492226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996811,0.00003934851,0.00007857501,0.000174113,0.000009559159,0.00001728924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001583939,0.00001532288,0.9803849,0.00001093265,0.000003787314,3.120909e-7,0.0002027199,0.009543334,0.0008694322,0.00008384902,0.006765414,0.002104186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003023773,0.00007639168,0.9633119,0.00001019001,0.000008358751,8.138917e-7,0.0007200262,0.0282277,0.002631667,0.0008335256,0.003769926,0.0001071619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842892,0.000001807953,0.00732474,0.0006186974,0.0005216248,0.0004455179,0.000001682845,0.000008770565,0.006788006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9142155,0.00001175539,0.08401847,0.0005091936,0.000008176463,0.00003249184,0.00000217412,0.000004219433,0.001197993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07669373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2301322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006356217597456314,"score_gpt":0.2155932296266345,"score_spread":0.2092370120291782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}