{"id":"W2990514734","doi":"10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.22.114602","title":"Fast radio frequency quadrupole envelope computation for model based beam tuning","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review Accelerators and Beams","topic":"Particle accelerators and beam dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"TRIUMF","funders":"National Research Council Canada; TRIUMF","keywords":"Radio-frequency quadrupole; Physics; Quadrupole; Beam (structure); Particle accelerator; Nuclear engineering; Computer science; Computation; Radio frequency; Benchmark (surveying); Envelope (radar); Nuclear physics; Optics; Atomic physics; Telecommunications; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001462302,0.0002696473,0.0004955596,0.00004232305,0.00009172061,0.00008429676,0.0001433126,0.00004979374,0.00001344971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000181061,0.000234741,0.0001372576,0.0002375999,0.00002848479,0.0003084218,0.00002586567,0.0001576243,0.00002983671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005515984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003853746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007642619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001578302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998833,0.00001659451,0.0003223351,0.0003008367,0.0001739127,0.0003533347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994254,0.00008475197,0.00006109997,0.0001980127,0.00007381254,0.0001569533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004607683,0.0008010056,0.01301266,0.01575248,0.0002976428,0.000006211711,0.0006186645,0.4520898,0.2279315,0.01468826,0.004035235,0.2707205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004409312,0.00007295469,0.0004519593,0.0004246722,0.00005584455,9.841335e-7,0.00000946518,0.9933537,0.003076743,0.001186182,0.0005707443,0.0003557869],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9317637,0.004949386,0.06155912,0.00009138929,0.0001465392,0.0008086046,0.00003411436,0.0001894483,0.0004577046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944283,0.00100664,0.003795116,0.0004236841,0.0001162918,0.0001031815,0.00005698673,0.00005468978,0.00001508946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5412639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9572459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01659000025800316,"score_gpt":0.268380737236295,"score_spread":0.2517907369782919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}