{"id":"W2990534220","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1682","title":"Multicriteria decision making for sustainable development: A systematic review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Sustainability; Management science; Sustainable development; Dimension (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Process management; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Operations research; Engineering; Political science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005181576,0.001064078,0.009356271,0.003862955,0.0001879311,0.0006354972,0.001453853,0.0004771726,0.0002260683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003012922,0.0007791503,0.003993274,0.002893043,0.00002376807,0.0005252679,0.000221121,0.0005918544,0.00005955713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001523412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005877041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001009228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001889277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913605,0.0003987884,0.005655607,0.0005885548,0.001128362,0.0008681745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918131,0.002838578,0.002290566,0.001096846,0.001678143,0.000282795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002648427,0.00009924933,4.747328e-7,0.7578197,0.005153086,0.000225989,0.0000746145,0.0005902605,0.000001109214,0.000007798645,0.002894235,0.2331071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007559337,0.0000563999,0.000001131882,0.6082571,0.04019333,0.0001418774,0.0002411157,0.01401146,0.000001219754,0.00003261766,0.3355228,0.0007850263],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005807792,0.6603291,0.3369086,0.000002346502,0.000503717,0.002176658,0.00001475363,0.00004767021,0.00001131554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007865042,0.8803749,0.1184753,0.00004879781,0.0001224529,0.0002216719,0.00004089113,0.0001800979,0.000457269],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3326286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05319123017937299,"score_gpt":0.3891394603204502,"score_spread":0.3359482301410772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}