{"id":"W2990673677","doi":"","title":"환경영향평가제도를 둘러싼 한미FTA 투자분쟁의 가능성: Bilcon 대 캐나다 투자자-국가 간 소송 사례를 통한 교훈","year":2012,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Relation (database); Political science; Settlement (finance); Investor-state dispute settlement; Business; International trade; Law; Finance; Foreign direct investment; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002657446,0.000196646,0.0001877514,0.0007832846,0.004860751,0.005325533,0.0008752396,0.00278361,0.005399525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004140156,0.0001924619,0.0003967875,0.0007570436,0.003643443,0.003950083,0.001973002,0.002249571,0.0003433491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007886461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007340408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04979082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05578049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997021,0.000646982,0.0001527086,0.0004535075,0.0008322404,0.0008935187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970214,0.001198973,0.0006437311,0.0002122976,0.0007712642,0.0001524017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000171825,0.0001810523,0.0691251,0.000184021,0.000045547,0.006537685,0.01346372,0.002834114,0.002877153,0.8771347,0.005179913,0.02226507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001354273,0.0006134665,0.09217791,0.0007555813,0.0003385564,0.009930601,0.1741323,0.02933025,0.02199289,0.2470935,0.4231175,0.0003820962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7229307,0.000946829,0.006948345,0.00812384,0.0001013402,0.0002175228,0.0001241868,0.00002821953,0.260579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892396,0.000192264,0.0007161769,0.0007798658,0.0000100158,0.00002961058,0.00002784185,0.000003110864,0.009001593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9502092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01451604830762437,"score_gpt":0.3239213660941531,"score_spread":0.3094053177865287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}