{"id":"W2990756663","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2019-0270","title":"Using portfolio theory in spatial targeting of forest carbon payments: an effective strategy to address spatiotemporal variation in land-use opportunity costs?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Covariance; Portfolio; Modern portfolio theory; Variance (accounting); Econometrics; Investment (military); Spatial variability; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Financial economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006741563,0.001071942,0.001652079,0.001162768,0.0004641471,0.002500998,0.001392556,0.00176493,0.002053093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01654138,0.000783789,0.0007279384,0.001516667,0.001348202,0.005824064,0.001863898,0.00170981,0.0002089335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001751648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002272562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003164094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003428231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974825,0.001703681,0.00008064802,0.000249691,0.0003383526,0.0001452829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958454,0.002860262,0.0006091629,0.0002817379,0.0002931645,0.0001102845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004162616,0.0001278272,0.003146241,0.00008494556,0.0001379043,0.0001043188,0.0001099748,0.7837967,0.0005617981,0.1481185,0.0007457042,0.06302451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001592731,0.00005865099,0.0005624695,0.00002483553,0.0000216368,0.00004005532,0.00006368587,0.8830398,0.0002619379,0.115101,0.0007911663,0.00001883495],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04689943,0.0004405282,0.9446095,0.001919943,0.00005180654,0.00008964182,0.00003489669,0.00007747029,0.005876867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8207423,0.0006830865,0.1760287,0.0003346835,0.00009733996,0.0001761842,0.00003638092,0.00004906599,0.001852072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006741563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03565323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05430088654059478,"score_gpt":0.3313091763630325,"score_spread":0.2770082898224377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}