{"id":"W2991086064","doi":"10.1016/j.csda.2019.106887","title":"A goodness-of-fit test for zero-inflated Poisson mixed effects models in tree abundance studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Statistics; Sampling (signal processing); Goodness of fit; Poisson distribution; Mathematics; Sampling design; Econometrics; Tree (set theory); Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1538024,0.002278267,0.005367602,0.008217042,0.005118795,0.004042907,0.01027614,0.006896948,0.0157264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.418422,0.002062516,0.008343137,0.007628758,0.007366878,0.007527733,0.006056919,0.008783733,0.001800357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001985964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00443965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002705265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002306811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7486717,0.2101236,0.01155186,0.01785908,0.009675958,0.002117785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2956545,0.662079,0.00839461,0.02584944,0.005638213,0.002384274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01646114,0.002252568,0.3989408,0.003395875,0.02401851,0.007846217,0.006085107,0.0878507,0.00713472,0.1009528,0.02677803,0.3182835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002854893,0.008738146,0.1540354,0.001015402,0.004573056,0.007831383,0.004086022,0.6323736,0.004798298,0.1585979,0.02029024,0.0008056574],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2335001,0.001085835,0.7544551,0.001482307,0.0006036708,0.001104127,0.002245118,0.002294089,0.00322948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7306024,0.0001828147,0.2609511,0.0005549355,0.0002334042,0.002233196,0.002606372,0.001124777,0.001510945],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1538024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8133943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04211780529738059,"score_gpt":0.3166714450619174,"score_spread":0.2745536397645368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}