{"id":"W2991086064","doi":"10.1016/j.csda.2019.106887","title":"A goodness-of-fit test for zero-inflated Poisson mixed effects models in tree abundance studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Statistics; Sampling (signal processing); Goodness of fit; Poisson distribution; Mathematics; Sampling design; Econometrics; Tree (set theory); Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003737166,0.0001341989,0.0003703933,0.0001376356,0.00006889836,0.00001610496,0.0003911572,0.00004040591,0.0001078084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002843768,0.0001315139,0.00004750341,0.0006912618,0.0001307803,0.0002318954,0.0004085311,0.00005822525,0.00008005145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001037692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000136924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000326942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002651704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986884,0.00005064198,0.0003597448,0.0004499179,0.0002532152,0.0001980788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978751,0.00145829,0.0001933344,0.0003923791,0.00004098098,0.0000399064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000265326,0.0001685328,0.09664571,0.0000841634,0.0005940147,0.00000567612,0.0001135311,0.8723309,0.00001727333,0.02221721,0.005809106,0.001987332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003851097,0.00005730951,0.3154059,0.000008970299,0.0003477926,1.397216e-7,0.00001157365,0.5916385,0.000004296618,0.09194357,0.0001055217,0.00009128327],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1036755,0.0001043758,0.8941407,0.00007219278,0.00008934841,0.0004394082,0.001337122,0.00001426505,0.000127117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8687316,0.00003568066,0.1284602,0.0000682705,0.000005049778,0.00003036481,0.002429762,0.000008244121,0.0002308695],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7656804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.536298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04211780529738059,"score_gpt":0.3166714450619174,"score_spread":0.2745536397645368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}