{"id":"W2991226315","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v8i5.565","title":"Policy or Pathologization?: Questions into the Rhetoric of Inclusion and Acceptance in Schools","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Feminist Theory and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Queer; Sociology; Rhetoric; Agency (philosophy); Inclusion–exclusion principle; Gender studies; Government (linguistics); Politics; Disability studies; Heterosexism; Political science; Law; Homosexuality; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02058274,0.0005885575,0.000765931,0.002909986,0.02442615,0.02011758,0.002209379,0.008435901,0.003022215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03230806,0.0005702638,0.0005239712,0.002275358,0.1405796,0.02112849,0.01047216,0.01296725,0.0006323806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03552263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02195629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07768803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04312714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9706379,0.02254971,0.0005843674,0.001420964,0.00265036,0.002156832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630253,0.02962053,0.001883167,0.001278737,0.00302613,0.001166035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001792777,0.00002163131,0.0004383533,0.00007238512,0.00000369715,0.0001152435,0.3371315,0.0000628228,0.00009862719,0.6543039,0.002899898,0.004834136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003308758,0.0000423023,0.001712358,0.001135277,0.00002362386,0.0001679589,0.4094465,0.0003902023,0.0007139053,0.4195535,0.1667215,0.00005976503],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1474952,0.0131894,0.007487231,0.5639489,0.001501949,0.00007259639,0.00004741453,0.00008030386,0.266177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835821,0.001665255,0.0003646,0.009200593,0.0002884409,0.00003808725,0.000007491647,0.00004573827,0.004807708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.922312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.257736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0357010569146847,"score_gpt":0.3684944546068463,"score_spread":0.3327933976921615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}