{"id":"W2991226315","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v8i5.565","title":"Policy or Pathologization?: Questions into the Rhetoric of Inclusion and Acceptance in Schools","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Feminist Theory and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Queer; Sociology; Rhetoric; Agency (philosophy); Inclusion–exclusion principle; Gender studies; Government (linguistics); Politics; Disability studies; Heterosexism; Political science; Law; Homosexuality; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001566875,0.0000666774,0.0002257894,0.0000767379,0.0008017947,0.00001737767,0.0002081503,0.00003817527,0.00001983157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005350647,0.00004129859,0.00003820157,0.000454046,0.001273273,0.0001527069,0.0001020701,0.0001360125,0.000001138447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004025086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008150573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00907902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4911622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989967,0.0003226582,0.0002904503,0.00009131723,0.0001366565,0.0001621979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989752,0.0004493327,0.0001410478,0.0001151432,0.0002158934,0.0001033559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000234166,0.00002159864,0.6352882,0.00003847533,0.00003737428,0.000003067666,0.3009599,0.00002326356,0.000008887901,0.05779577,0.0001617474,0.005638286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002626863,0.0001521277,0.4842401,0.0001393397,0.0000202655,0.000003155775,0.3775282,0.000001131543,0.00001190149,0.1329089,0.004627516,0.0001047541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694666,0.004519125,0.000003992159,0.02337882,0.0002818729,0.0001645583,0.000005123962,0.000002460027,0.002177439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981881,0.001333817,0.0000676878,0.0001243078,0.0000963545,0.000003222991,1.007646e-7,0.000002411141,0.0001840189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4820831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0357010569146847,"score_gpt":0.3684944546068463,"score_spread":0.3327933976921615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}