{"id":"W2991264434","doi":"10.1007/s40258-019-00535-x","title":"Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Services Provided by Community Pharmacists","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Canadian Pharmacists Association","funders":"Association des pharmaciens du Canada","keywords":"Economic evaluation; Observational study; Health economics; Health care; Public health; Health services research; Medicine; Health administration; MEDLINE; Population; Quality (philosophy); Population health; Family medicine; Actuarial science; Nursing; Environmental health; Business; Political science; Economic growth; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01782366,0.001939293,0.01133346,0.007450671,0.0005455132,0.002854553,0.002100507,0.002056574,0.005610462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09298416,0.001162761,0.01170828,0.008220086,0.001337753,0.002053612,0.002040398,0.002274084,0.0002367118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01076908,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01120624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02781776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.975998,0.01146585,0.007690007,0.00105115,0.003335915,0.0004591072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466907,0.04004377,0.009211645,0.0008432106,0.002732847,0.0004778962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001572882,0.00002806187,0.000911034,0.9073591,0.06395893,0.00006164202,0.00007997478,0.0001690717,0.00007825668,0.000237528,0.001201742,0.02434182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003474008,0.0005573931,0.007383917,0.6044462,0.3698179,0.0003012317,0.0002018109,0.0002189494,0.0002065468,0.000723518,0.01260714,0.00006146243],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003651745,0.9929318,0.0003868966,0.0002906362,0.0001761252,0.0008698435,0.001256002,0.00001693035,0.0004200065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07265554,0.922565,0.001610187,0.0007474012,0.000145639,0.001413935,0.0006355388,0.0000146911,0.0002121046],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01782366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09426171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4666027630594449,"score_gpt":0.5659642547818915,"score_spread":0.09936149172244657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}