{"id":"W2991365617","doi":"10.1289/isee.2016.3320","title":"Assessing the Usability of the Risk Of Bias in Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions (ROBINS-I) Tool for Studies of Exposure and Intervention in Environmental Health Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISEE Conference Abstracts","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Usability; Environmental health; Randomized controlled trial; Confounding; Systematic review; Psychology; Medicine; Applied psychology; MEDLINE; Computer science; Nursing; Pathology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7186243,0.008217804,0.01683319,0.03495844,0.003798569,0.01190491,0.007967425,0.008394259,0.01739758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.865767,0.006022557,0.04429141,0.02538774,0.01332845,0.01226879,0.01694252,0.009964934,0.002844403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01307352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01889056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002123995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003429933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.09751964,0.6742911,0.1790062,0.01186232,0.0360621,0.001258643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03279203,0.8639659,0.03967404,0.02944159,0.03323672,0.0008896716],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01217207,0.0005368696,0.03083937,0.4570096,0.06403244,0.0007442894,0.0183969,0.006120705,0.002517992,0.04537985,0.07026749,0.2919825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02923065,0.007578859,0.07118538,0.2876491,0.06448489,0.002708861,0.01099253,0.05554464,0.01502398,0.1547371,0.2960136,0.004850422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02639408,0.04491897,0.5481348,0.01419261,0.0100592,0.3070943,0.02384404,0.01129738,0.01406466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04472352,0.001840314,0.6374089,0.001701212,0.0004426473,0.311184,0.001350926,0.0006336601,0.0007148494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2813757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3469864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.26247871981334,"score_gpt":0.4549656607136847,"score_spread":0.1924869409003446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}