{"id":"W2991494446","doi":"10.1111/cag.12583","title":"The politics of water security in southern Saskatchewan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"General Electric (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"Social Science Research Council","keywords":"Politics; Potash; Ideology; Salience (neuroscience); Water security; Resource (disambiguation); Government (linguistics); Boom; Natural resource economics; Political science; Economy; Economics; Political economy; Business; Water resources; Law; Environmental science; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005285129,0.0002474193,0.0004634399,0.001880157,0.0002787645,0.00008762868,0.0005497093,0.000152069,0.0002956103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000318682,0.000202804,0.0002371063,0.001047715,0.0004697685,0.000118469,0.0000591032,0.0002283435,0.0001590341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001486138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008125858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7513768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9867094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975945,0.00001775969,0.0007529495,0.0004157702,0.00004651458,0.001172487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987804,0.00007799421,0.0001740694,0.0005082961,0.00004497994,0.0004142295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001093007,0.0000122174,0.9310996,0.00004528038,0.0001172755,0.000008890178,0.01141865,0.00001939781,0.000005476737,0.05543791,0.0009974461,0.0008269119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008823618,0.0001110158,0.1552978,0.00005900376,0.00001069297,0.00001315516,0.07596198,0.0001199544,0.00007002242,0.1121982,0.654313,0.0009628356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839252,0.004295854,2.474336e-7,0.001282007,0.0007049285,0.0003070002,0.0003326912,0.00001532431,0.009136729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959012,0.0005112191,0.00002259919,0.0002839105,0.00004326162,0.00002380105,0.00003242707,0.0000307649,0.003150761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7758018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8270108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006236980786960105,"score_gpt":0.1582539926641381,"score_spread":0.152017011877178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}