{"id":"W2991548593","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000323","title":"Political Independence, Territorial Integrity and Private Law Analogies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Politics; Relevance (law); Private law; Relation (database); Political science; Law and economics; Treaty; Law; Order (exchange); Territorial integrity; Private property; Property (philosophy); Public law; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Sovereignty","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002805671,0.0002326713,0.0005338376,0.003311433,0.001010462,0.003699819,0.0006972037,0.001756496,0.005309755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005418667,0.0001711329,0.0003736159,0.003963648,0.01703957,0.006342884,0.002250273,0.003189228,0.0004060498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002985489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00189889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002675714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002090539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955518,0.002877175,0.0001619717,0.0003978499,0.0008399122,0.0001712902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958347,0.003002911,0.0003459728,0.0003171072,0.0004268899,0.00007244996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006323467,0.00000387961,0.0001027226,0.0001884235,0.000009375133,0.00001793209,0.0003491976,0.0002177342,0.00003402815,0.985966,0.001185139,0.01191916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007594007,0.00001634397,0.001371236,0.001073045,0.00001901601,0.00011895,0.0007939386,0.0003409825,0.000149168,0.8551322,0.1409656,0.00001190906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02953262,0.5248495,0.02802955,0.05856636,0.001261879,0.00003091678,0.0001798994,0.00005081695,0.3574985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8170866,0.1624174,0.003043978,0.005694608,0.001345254,0.00005270965,0.0001662446,0.00002431784,0.01016889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005309755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02166134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06045766206583214,"score_gpt":0.3707808800203948,"score_spread":0.3103232179545627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}