{"id":"W2991891407","doi":"10.3233/ajw-2008-5_3_09","title":"Water Conservation for Livelihoods and Labour Constraints: A Case Study from Nepal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Water Environment and Pollution","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Water resource management; Geography; Business; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Environmental planning; Economics; Agriculture; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000780854,0.0004410183,0.0003930767,0.0006772223,0.00352137,0.001622918,0.001016681,0.00172372,0.002862455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019951,0.000245541,0.0003197034,0.001279704,0.001117507,0.001033522,0.001661308,0.0009334147,0.0002131242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001792239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001492913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02719431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06361873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994134,0.0002851748,0.00001755148,0.00004058727,0.00007073881,0.0001725962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998741,0.0008081527,0.0001218436,0.00005718507,0.00009772858,0.0001742192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008582032,0.005207833,0.2354788,0.001700779,0.000201894,0.3025307,0.2561956,0.01032614,0.007745593,0.01779037,0.00912258,0.1528416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002003383,0.003207893,0.202159,0.0007408755,0.0001499472,0.04719194,0.6752401,0.01314357,0.003777411,0.005343116,0.04865592,0.0001898404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955778,0.000127477,0.0002544863,0.0003807086,0.000003214134,0.00006609479,0.00006065228,0.000003408827,0.003526154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958338,0.0006038789,0.0009913227,0.0001900126,0.000006621316,0.0001040599,0.00006131965,0.000006106337,0.002202829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02719431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05407208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01064120621323428,"score_gpt":0.1791833621245255,"score_spread":0.1685421559112912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}