{"id":"W2992022329","doi":"10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.11.257","title":"Reading Pornography: Methodological Considerations in Evaluating Pornography Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pornography; Reading (process); Psychology; Empirical research; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02820101,0.0001646629,0.0005996717,0.001369568,0.000157576,0.00001138824,0.000452428,0.0002339281,0.00224946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002629549,0.00009595619,0.00003150443,0.001270045,0.0008259627,0.00009002418,0.00008504617,0.00187128,0.00004413497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000453954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007092853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004916511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004545722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934483,0.003932898,0.001053979,0.0002384916,0.0008144549,0.0005118677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914896,0.006934635,0.00044067,0.0005547837,0.0004695214,0.0001107901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001414399,0.0009184701,0.3661148,0.00006096077,0.0005056172,0.0006386787,0.05327928,0.00005105304,0.4142049,0.1055197,0.01837358,0.03891847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009945114,0.03980896,0.580565,0.00051092,0.0005702479,0.005738033,0.2388292,0.00005073654,0.0009135546,0.1180276,0.004474458,0.0005661353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.981298,0.001677944,0.0001228225,0.008038116,0.001291539,0.0003605847,0.000001506193,0.00002916079,0.007180377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996848,0.00004264433,0.001284873,0.0005632425,0.0004375374,0.000008782714,0.000001980475,0.00001865236,0.0007942112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4132914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.518784044492485,"score_gpt":0.5702423484045276,"score_spread":0.05145830391204254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}