{"id":"W2992022329","doi":"10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.11.257","title":"Reading Pornography: Methodological Considerations in Evaluating Pornography Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pornography; Reading (process); Psychology; Empirical research; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6864117,0.002554236,0.005292197,0.01899804,0.008146372,0.01743725,0.01131329,0.007221329,0.005492047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8783258,0.002529849,0.004632714,0.01781382,0.02368445,0.01297415,0.008989612,0.007836943,0.001367663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01477392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03527761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007525136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01191908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1245147,0.718556,0.09691142,0.008489605,0.04937921,0.002149032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07423285,0.7722949,0.05531908,0.04208443,0.05378926,0.002279468],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005799272,0.0008966,0.05915075,0.09856824,0.005615597,0.002104592,0.1648721,0.003512095,0.00320917,0.2173926,0.09150738,0.3473717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002093015,0.003528362,0.06246506,0.1811849,0.00626345,0.001963933,0.06412819,0.01180835,0.009399301,0.3586918,0.2973138,0.001159736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.06667769,0.08264912,0.4854515,0.2043694,0.03591694,0.08718715,0.003746923,0.001012613,0.03298872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3363217,0.01132025,0.4279439,0.04331087,0.005587959,0.1712112,0.0008436199,0.0004989319,0.002961578],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3135883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3867102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.518784044492485,"score_gpt":0.5702423484045276,"score_spread":0.05145830391204254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}